As a Republican, I strongly wish to preserve traditional marriage not as a suspicion or denigration of my homosexual friends, but as recognition of the significance of the procreative family as a building block of society.
Yes. Because if we let men marry other men, then heterosexuals will forget that they have to fuck in order to create replacements. They will suddenly lose all interest in the procreative process and humanity will die out within a hundred years.
Or maybe he’s saying that non-procreative families are not important to society, which would imply that heterosexuals who have no interest in procreating, or those who lack the physical ability must be stopped as well.
No, wait. He’s completely reasonable. He wishes to bestow an honor upon a crucial and honored cultural function, which is the very miracle of the birth of a baby into a loving family. Who could argue with that? And the only way to bestow this honor is to stop those damned fags from getting hitched.
What the hell is he saying?
Post a Comment